Top Stories

Woody Allen Responds One Last Time to Dylan Farrow's Sexual Molestation Accusations

Woody Allen Responds One Last Time to Dylan Farrow's Sexual Molestation Accusations

Woody Allen has written an op-ed for the New York Times where he tells his entire version of what his story against the allegations that he sexually abused his daughter Dylan Farrow.

Mia [Farrow] insisted that I had abused Dylan and took her immediately to a doctor to be examined. Dylan told the doctor she had not been molested,” the 78-year-old director wrote. “Mia then took Dylan out for ice cream, and when she came back with her the child had changed her story.”

“Not that I doubt Dylan hasn’t come to believe she’s been molested, but if from the age of 7 a vulnerable child is taught by a strong mother to hate her father because he is a monster who abused her, is it so inconceivable that after many years of this indoctrination the image of me Mia wanted to establish had taken root?” Woody added.

“Of course, I did not molest Dylan. I loved her and hope one day she will grasp how she has been cheated out of having a loving father and exploited by a mother more interested in her own festering anger than her daughter’s well-being,” Woody continued.

In the letter, Woody says this will be his final word on the subject. He also discusses the very controversial topic involving Ronan Farrow‘s real biological father – him or Frank Sinatra.

Click inside to read the letter in its entirety…

TWENTY-ONE years ago, when I first heard Mia Farrow had accused me of child molestation, I found the idea so ludicrous I didn’t give it a second thought. We were involved in a terribly acrimonious breakup, with great enmity between us and a custody battle slowly gathering energy. The self-serving transparency of her malevolence seemed so obvious I didn’t even hire a lawyer to defend myself. It was my show business attorney who told me she was bringing the accusation to the police and I would need a criminal lawyer.

I naïvely thought the accusation would be dismissed out of hand because of course, I hadn’t molested Dylan and any rational person would see the ploy for what it was. Common sense would prevail. After all, I was a 56-year-old man who had never before (or after) been accused of child molestation. I had been going out with Mia for 12 years and never in that time did she ever suggest to me anything resembling misconduct. Now, suddenly, when I had driven up to her house in Connecticut one afternoon to visit the kids for a few hours, when I would be on my raging adversary’s home turf, with half a dozen people present, when I was in the blissful early stages of a happy new relationship with the woman I’d go on to marry — that I would pick this moment in time to embark on a career as a child molester should seem to the most skeptical mind highly unlikely. The sheer illogic of such a crazy scenario seemed to me dispositive.

Notwithstanding, Mia insisted that I had abused Dylan and took her immediately to a doctor to be examined. Dylan told the doctor she had not been molested. Mia then took Dylan out for ice cream, and when she came back with her the child had changed her story. The police began their investigation; a possible indictment hung in the balance. I very willingly took a lie-detector test and of course passed because I had nothing to hide. I asked Mia to take one and she wouldn’t. Last week a woman named Stacey Nelkin, whom I had dated many years ago, came forward to the press to tell them that when Mia and I first had our custody battle 21 years ago, Mia had wanted her to testify that she had been underage when I was dating her, despite the fact this was untrue. Stacey refused. I include this anecdote so we all know what kind of character we are dealing with here. One can imagine in learning this why she wouldn’t take a lie-detector test.

Meanwhile the Connecticut police turned for help to a special investigative unit they relied on in such cases, the Child Sexual Abuse Clinic of the Yale-New Haven Hospital. This group of impartial, experienced men and women whom the district attorney looked to for guidance as to whether to prosecute, spent months doing a meticulous investigation, interviewing everyone concerned, and checking every piece of evidence. Finally they wrote their conclusion which I quote here: “It is our expert opinion that Dylan was not sexually abused by Mr. Allen. Further, we believe that Dylan’s statements on videotape and her statements to us during our evaluation do not refer to actual events that occurred to her on August 4th, 1992… In developing our opinion we considered three hypotheses to explain Dylan’s statements. First, that Dylan’s statements were true and that Mr. Allen had sexually abused her; second, that Dylan’s statements were not true but were made up by an emotionally vulnerable child who was caught up in a disturbed family and who was responding to the stresses in the family; and third, that Dylan was coached or influenced by her mother, Ms. Farrow. While we can conclude that Dylan was not sexually abused, we can not be definite about whether the second formulation by itself or the third formulation by itself is true. We believe that it is more likely that a combination of these two formulations best explains Dylan’s allegations of sexual abuse.”

Could it be any clearer? Mr. Allen did not abuse Dylan; most likely a vulnerable, stressed-out 7-year-old was coached by Mia Farrow. This conclusion disappointed a number of people. The district attorney was champing at the bit to prosecute a celebrity case, and Justice Elliott Wilk, the custody judge, wrote a very irresponsible opinion saying when it came to the molestation, “we will probably never know what occurred.”

But we did know because it had been determined and there was no equivocation about the fact that no abuse had taken place. Justice Wilk was quite rough on me and never approved of my relationship with Soon-Yi, Mia’s adopted daughter, who was then in her early 20s. He thought of me as an older man exploiting a much younger woman, which outraged Mia as improper despite the fact she had dated a much older Frank Sinatra when she was 19. In fairness to Justice Wilk, the public felt the same dismay over Soon-Yi and myself, but despite what it looked like our feelings were authentic and we’ve been happily married for 16 years with two great kids, both adopted. (Incidentally, coming on the heels of the media circus and false accusations, Soon-Yi and I were extra carefully scrutinized by both the adoption agency and adoption courts, and everyone blessed our adoptions.)

Mia took custody of the children and we went our separate ways.

I was heartbroken. Moses was angry with me. Ronan I didn’t know well because Mia would never let me get close to him from the moment he was born and Dylan, whom I adored and was very close to and about whom Mia called my sister in a rage and said, “He took my daughter, now I’ll take his.” I never saw her again nor was I able to speak with her no matter how hard I tried. I still loved her deeply, and felt guilty that by falling in love with Soon-Yi I had put her in the position of being used as a pawn for revenge. Soon-Yi and I made countless attempts to see Dylan but Mia blocked them all, spitefully knowing how much we both loved her but totally indifferent to the pain and damage she was causing the little girl merely to appease her own vindictiveness.

Here I quote Moses Farrow, 14 at the time: “My mother drummed it into me to hate my father for tearing apart the family and sexually molesting my sister.” Moses is now 36 years old and a family therapist by profession. “Of course Woody did not molest my sister,” he said. “She loved him and looked forward to seeing him when he would visit. She never hid from him until our mother succeeded in creating the atmosphere of fear and hate towards him.” Dylan was 7, Ronan 4, and this was, according to Moses, the steady narrative year after year.

I pause here for a quick word on the Ronan situation. Is he my son or, as Mia suggests, Frank Sinatra’s? Granted, he looks a lot like Frank with the blue eyes and facial features, but if so what does this say? That all during the custody hearing Mia lied under oath and falsely represented Ronan as our son? Even if he is not Frank’s, the possibility she raises that he could be, indicates she was secretly intimate with him during our years. Not to mention all the money I paid for child support. Was I supporting Frank’s son? Again, I want to call attention to the integrity and honesty of a person who conducts her life like that.

NOW it’s 21 years later and Dylan has come forward with the accusations that the Yale experts investigated and found false. Plus a few little added creative flourishes that seem to have magically appeared during our 21-year estrangement.

Not that I doubt Dylan hasn’t come to believe she’s been molested, but if from the age of 7 a vulnerable child is taught by a strong mother to hate her father because he is a monster who abused her, is it so inconceivable that after many years of this indoctrination the image of me Mia wanted to establish had taken root? Is it any wonder the experts at Yale had picked up the maternal coaching aspect 21 years ago? Even the venue where the fabricated molestation was supposed to have taken place was poorly chosen but interesting. Mia chose the attic of her country house, a place she should have realized I’d never go to because it is a tiny, cramped, enclosed spot where one can hardly stand up and I’m a major claustrophobe. The one or two times she asked me to come in there to look at something, I did, but quickly had to run out. Undoubtedly the attic idea came to her from the Dory Previn song, “With My Daddy in the Attic.” It was on the same record as the song Dory Previn had written about Mia’s betraying their friendship by insidiously stealing her husband, André, “Beware of Young Girls.” One must ask, did Dylan even write the letter or was it at least guided by her mother? Does the letter really benefit Dylan or does it simply advance her mother’s shabby agenda? That is to hurt me with a smear. There is even a lame attempt to do professional damage by trying to involve movie stars, which smells a lot more like Mia than Dylan.

After all, if speaking out was really a necessity for Dylan, she had already spoken out months earlier in Vanity Fair. Here I quote Moses Farrow again: “Knowing that my mother often used us as pawns, I cannot trust anything that is said or written from anyone in the family.” Finally, does Mia herself really even believe I molested her daughter? Common sense must ask: Would a mother who thought her 7-year-old daughter was sexually abused by a molester (a pretty horrific crime), give consent for a film clip of her to be used to honor the molester at the Golden Globes?

Of course, I did not molest Dylan. I loved her and hope one day she will grasp how she has been cheated out of having a loving father and exploited by a mother more interested in her own festering anger than her daughter’s well-being. Being taught to hate your father and made to believe he molested you has already taken a psychological toll on this lovely young woman, and Soon-Yi and I are both hoping that one day she will understand who has really made her a victim and reconnect with us, as Moses has, in a loving, productive way. No one wants to discourage abuse victims from speaking out, but one must bear in mind that sometimes there are people who are falsely accused and that is also a terribly destructive thing. (This piece will be my final word on this entire matter and no one will be responding on my behalf to any further comments on it by any party. Enough people have been hurt.)

Like Just Jared on Facebook

JJ Links Around The Web

Neilson Barnard/Getty

200 Responses to “Woody Allen Responds One Last Time to Dylan Farrow's Sexual Molestation Accusations”

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 78 » Show All

  1. 1
    GGGive Says:

    i believe him

  2. 2
    Justina Says:

    We all know you are a dirty, old man, Woody. There have been rumours about you going after young girls for decades. For goodness’ sake you went after your ex-wife’s daughter when she was a teenager! Deny it all you want, there is definitely a lot of truth out there to support Dylan’s allegations!

  3. 3
    Lola Says:

    Same old woody, attacking mia to discredit dylan. He is such a sicko and I’m glad that dylan keeps responding, she won’t be silenced anymore and I’m very proud of her.

  4. 4
    Rai Says:

    I do too.

  5. 5
    Rai Says:

    Meant I believe him too

  6. 6
    Looselipz Says:

    Although I found it twisted that he ended up with his step daughter, I truly do not believe he molested his daughter. Mia is crazy, and never got over the betrayal. And I happen to know Woody is not only claustrophobic, he’s a huge germaphobe as well.

  7. 7
    M Says:

    for one – if he treasured his daughter’s happiness so much he wouldn’t have released this letter.

    and two – sexual abuse evidence can ONLY be inconclusive, experts can never say FOR SURE that abuse never happened.

  8. 8
    Cleo Says:

    This pervert needs to be put in jail.

  9. 9
    samantha Says:

    I believe Woody, too. But here’s one thing I don’t agree with. He compares his relationship with Soon Yi to Mia’s with Frank Sinatra. As far as I know, Frank Sinatra didn’t have a father figure type relationship with Mia, before they started dating. But, on the other hand, Soon Yi was not Woody’s daughter. Andre Previn was her adoptive father. Woody was the guy her mother was dating.

    As far as I know, even though they spent a lot of time together, Mia & Woody never lived together. So maybe Woody was just an “uncle” figure to Soon Yi. The Soon Yi-Mia-Woody triangle is nothing new. There are lots of ordinary single women out here who have daughters who go after their boyfriends. Soon Yi was not a child.

    She was an adult who obviously had issues with Mia. I think Mia is a very unstable person. She has many fine qualities, but she’s emotionally unstable and she has to resent the fact that Woody has enjoyed so much success and he is being applauded for his work.
    I’m sick and tired of reading about it. Dylan needs help.

  10. 10
    someone Says:

    the fat that you had an affair and went on to marry your own daughter is proof enough to me that you have no morals.

  11. 11
    believe Says:

    I believe him!

  12. 12
    essie Says:

    His letter sounds like it was ghostwritten by his lawyers.. it took about a week for him to respond and just regurgitates what his lawyers already said. Dylan has already responded to his letter denouncing his ‘facts’. I remember when Woody’s marriage to Soonyi made it on the covers of People, and I was around the same age as Soonyi.. creeped me out then, still creeps me out now. Dylan’s accusations of what Woody did to her, I don’t know how anyone could coach a 7 yr old to be so specific.

  13. 13
    oe Says:

    This whole thing is a mess. I still believe Dylan though, I think the abuse happened. She was 7 years old at the time, I’m close to her age and I have plenty of memories from that age. No way I would forget a traumatic memory like that. And she is an adult now, living her own life away from Mia so there’s no reason she would be easily manipulated at this age about something like this unless it had some truth to it. Unless she is extremely emotionally unstable there is no way she would make this up or have false memories of what happened. That said, perhaps some of the things about Mia are also true. Perhaps she is controlling and vengeful. I don’t know. Still doesn’t mean the abuse didn’t happen.

  14. 14
    kim Says:

    @someone: She wasn’t his own daughter. Mia adopted her together with her ex-husband Andre Previn.
    Mia has admitted that her son might indeed be from a romance with Frank Sinatra. If this is the case then she met with Frank whilst in a relationship with Woody so that means she would lack some serious morals as well.

    Other than that, I hope for everyone involved that the truth will come out.
    No matter what the truth is, Dylan remains the victim :(

  15. 15
    Maya Says:

    mmm…let me see…who should I believe… the girl that claims with a lot of detail to have been abused… or the man that took nude pictures of his teenage stepdaughter…mmm…DUH!

  16. 16
    groundcontrol Says:

    @essie:
    .
    ###########
    .
    ROTFLMAO! Oh, right. Woody Allen can’t write for himself. Get real.

  17. 17
    Domino Says:

    To those saying he was a father figure to his now wife, you do know she has a father figure, right? The man Mia was with when they adopted her? And that she and Woody never even lived together or were actually father and daughter? Because the ignorance in this place is staggering.

  18. 18
    Sam Says:

    He did it! He is guilty!!

  19. 19
    shanice Says:

    so, ronan is a frankie’s son then – officially? this is so fascinating!

  20. 20
    Living in a box Says:

    @M: Well, Dylan the one started it first. Guilty or not Woody have right to defend himself. like i said before this is definitely he said she said situation.

  21. 21
    Truth Says:

    Not only is Woody a perv and pedophile, Soon-Yi is just as sick. Most normal children by the age 13 can clearly distinguish the right from wrong. What type of person does it take to betray your mother and your siblings, basically destroy your family in exchange for an old, unattractive man who is your mother’s boyfriend, and your siblings father? Even if its true that Woody was never around her and she didnt see him as her father, he was still the father to her brother and sister.
    If Woody is innocent, why would he choose to romance this child who is still living with her mother, has no money, no independence, in the sea of rich beautiful women in Hollywood?
    It’s clear that he’s a pervert who wanted a needy child who he can manipulate and not think for herself.
    I dont doubt Dylan’s story one bit based on his eye for underage kids.
    The only reason he’s not in jail is because he’s paid people off to ruin the inestigation and destroy evidence. He wont last long though, hes old and shriveled and the world will be a better place once this sick perv is 6 feet under.

  22. 22
    Domino Says:

    Also, no idea how people can just believe what they want to believe. Think what you want about Woody but if Dylan was actually checked by doctors, and there are records, and it was confirmed that she wasn’t abused, how the ‘fcuk’ do you keep saying he did it? Again, too much ignorance here. Siding with a woman just because she’s a woman is pathetic

  23. 23
    remember da truth Says:

    Mia has proven over and over that she is still bitter about her adopted daughter running off with her lover who NEVER was a father to Soon-Yi, when their relationship was winding down.

    Anyone who believes the stories that Dylan and Mia are throwing out there is refusing to look at facts, for the reason of wanting to hate Allen for their own reasons. For a long time, I believed he was a creep for hurting Mia, but there has NEVER been evidence he was a pedophile. For Mia to throw that out there is SICK, and to try to make her own daughter believe it and live through it, shows who the truly SICK “parent” is.

    Time for Mia to move on. Even his ex-wife, who hated him, has admitted that Mia tried to get her to lie about him going after young girls, and she couldn’t do it. The “rumors” referred to are all started by Mia — he never had a reputation for going after children before Mia started this. Most men do like young girls — Mia married Frank Sinatra at age 19, and had been seeing him for a while before that. Doesn’t make him a pedophile.

  24. 24
    remember da truth Says:

    Soon-Yi has been Allen’s wife for many years. She has been met by many intelligent, worldly people, who all say she is not a brainwashed dupe, but rather a woman who did not bond with her mother, did not like her mother’s pushy ways, and saw her mother no longer in love with her boyfriend, but rather using him as her way to make movies and money. Mia’s lack of work shows she couldn’t stand on her own, and Soon-Yi didn’t like her mother’s hypocritical, using ways. By the time she was a teen, among a dozen or more other adopted kids, she was independent and making her own decisions. She hasn’t been a captive, isn’t a fool, and is perfectly capable of leaving anytime she would have wanted. She has raised her own family quietly, scandal-free. Give the woman more credit.
    Just because you want something to be true, doesn’t mean it is.

  25. 25
    Justina Says:

    @Domino: Doctors are often wrong and sometimes doctors can be bought. People are not believing Dylan because she’s a “woman” as you claim, they believe her because of Woody’s track record. He started a sexual relationship with Mia’s daughter while said daughter was a teenager and he was in his 50′s He obviously likes them young.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 78 » Show All

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here