Top Stories

Hugh Jackman Almost Sliced Off His Penis with His Wolverine Claws!

Hugh Jackman Almost Sliced Off His Penis with His Wolverine Claws!

X-Men Days of Future Past co-stars Michael Fassbender, Hugh Jackman, and James McAvoy share a laugh while making an appearance on The Graham Norton Show during an appearance on Thursday (May 1).

While on the show, Hugh described how his Wolverine claws almost sliced off his penis!

“There was a very intense first scene and I insisted on a closed set,” Hugh said. “I ran around the corner and all the female members of the crew were gathered there. I tried to cover myself and cut my inner thigh. It was just the inner thigh, thankfully. The metal claws had to go-you can’t have bits and pieces flying off.”

Be sure to catch the guys in the latest X-Men installment, in theaters on May 23!

Just Jared on Facebook
hugh jackman nearly sliced off his penis with wolverine claws 01
hugh jackman nearly sliced off his penis with wolverine claws 02
hugh jackman nearly sliced off his penis with wolverine claws 03
hugh jackman nearly sliced off his penis with wolverine claws 04

Credit: Jonathan Brady/PA Wire
Posted to: James McAvoy, Michael Fassbender

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Katt Williams reportedly isn't cooperating with police in his gun investigation - TMZ
  • Dylan Sprouse had tons of support at the premiere of his new movie - Just Jared Jr
  • Josh Groban reacts to being the subject of one of Katy Perry's hit songs - TooFab
  • The reviews are in for Joaquin Phoenix's new movie - Lainey Gossip
  • This YouTuber just bravely came out as bisexual - Just Jared Jr
  • Justin Bieber is perfectly healthy - Gossip Cop
  • GFW

    What we’ll say for hits and attention. Wow. You do realize this is an international site and anyone at any age can see this stuff and nonsense, right?
    Nice story though, I’ll say that. Just not too sure it should be the LEAD in for a thread is all.

  • Lisa

    The Graham Norton show is the best talk show on TV.

  • Shiba

    I love when actors share their happiness together and to the public

  • Ava

    @ Lisa I agree, love that show, Graham is so good as a host , juggling all the celebrities at one time, makes sure the show keeps moving and the red chair gag is fun every show.

  • #fail

    This show has not aired yet. Only on Friday nights, it was pre-recorded a month ago though.

  • WTF

    Why would you cut Graham’s head out of the frame? He’s just the f*cking host of that talk show. Never mind.

  • Miranda

    Agree completely that Graham Norton is THE best talk show host in the business and his shows are always hilariously entertaining.
    A shame about the hack editing job on this article though, completely chopping Graham’s head off like he’s a Stark or something.

  • DOFP

    The full show clip is on utube now! Go watch…it’s the best.

  • Lena

    How utterly vile. Why did Fassbender choose “blurred lines” (of all songs) to celebrate and obsess over? A song with lyrics which people and feminist groups claim promotes “RAPE” culture w/ some calling it a RAPE ANTHEM

    Robin Thicke’s video shows naked women parading around fully clothed men while women engage in degrading activities such as begging for sex, simulating sexual activity w/dead animals and asking for anal. I heard Fox Studios has BANNED questions about Bryan Singer’s alleged child RAPE of Michael Egan on the X-Men promotion tour. So, the FIRST thing the X-Men “distraction” squad of Fassbender/McAvoy/Jackman do is go on Graham Norton to make light of and downplay RAPE by dancing like fools to a song, they should know is controversial that way? Don’t these men have any consciences? To allow themselves to be a part of this? Are they willing participants or are they being forced? Are they mocking the public and Michael Egan here? Why “Blurred Lines” of all songs? A song with ambiguous references to RAPE on a film promotion tour, where their director is being sued under for MINOR CHILD rape? (i.e., forcible rape of a minor).

    I was wondering why there was suddenly, out of nowhere an article about Fassbender being obsessed with Blurred Line’s video several weeks ago, (before or after the Egan RAPE case hit?) So is THAT what Fox is doing? Issuing a GAG ORDER to the press banning questions about the Bryan Singer scandal w/orders to their actor goons, Fassbender/McAvoy/Jackman to not only downplay RAPE, but to make light of a song about RAPE, and go on tour to “distract” the public with talk about Jackman’s penis as well? Like he did on the Grahamn Norton show?

    Okay, so, no one can talk about or ask these fellas what they even think about the allegations that Bryan Singer RAPED and shoved his pen/is up Egan’s @SS against his will. Yet, the PR strategy and repeat promotion story line we are going to now keep hearing on talk show after talk show is Michael really digs this vile dehumanizing and degrading “rape culture” song against women and “little girls?” And we (the public who might see a PG13 movie is it?) now suddenly needs to focus on Jackman’s penis???? (as parents of kids seeing comic book movies???) But no one is allowed to discuss Egan’s rape allegations, the issue of abuse of power in Hollywood, and Bryan Singer possibly abusing his power and forcing HIS PEN/IS on Michael Egan? Unbelievable.

    In any event, is this “Blurred Lines” more than once X-Men Promotional Tour go to marketing ploy some sort of calculated attempt to make light of RAPE, forced sex, and get the public used to dismissing dehumanizing behavior as damage control in anticipation of the can of worms Egan’s suit might open which Fox could be worried might affect it’s profits? If so, and if Fassbender, McAvoy, and Jackman are willing participants in helping to distract the public from the Egan RAPE allegations, that’s disgusting.

  • Then and Now

    The execessive liking of the blurred lines video or song was informed to the public by hugh jackman in interview about making DOFP.
    It was brought up again by Graham Norton on his show.
    The liking of the song story has more to do with Michaels personal taste and sexual motivations. Not the Singer case.

  • Showtime

    Reckon there was about 20mins cut from the episode.
    I saw a tweet which said it was an 1hr and 10 mins when filming from an audience member and the show was only on for 50 mins.

    Also their was an article which says he discussed Steve Mcqueen and Fassbenders break during the interview at some point.
    This was not aired if its true.

  • lol

    @Showtime: LOL Yes, Fassy has right to refuse to say that name aloud and only the Scottish Film LOL and that ballet on a so vulgar song is a boomerang LOL It’s a fact, wild life in Canada during the shooting of the X men movie have certainly caused some consequences and who knows what lies behind the “affair” with Madalina LOL guesswork here a lot, and I think that many wrote something near the truth, but we’ll never know LOL

  • x lol

    a song about a prostitute

  • 3 is perfect number

    This is not a love song but a song about sex with a whore then blindgossip on her is right .

  • Nina

    @Lena: Seriously ! you have come on a gossip site for imagining a conspiracy because of a song!? Really really sorry for you!
    This program was recorded at the beginning of April and before Hugh Jackman had already given an interview about it! And if that was still not enough for you to Fox as a mega company would never take advantage of someone doubtful like Singer ! Bryan Singer will not even at the premiere! A little logic in your thinking and in your miserable life would not hurt!
    Come here to disparage the work of the actors promoting the film and their personal stories (super fun!) f… off!
    I will not even get into the merit of the music that is so sexually appealing as any in the market, nothing special just a bunch of people with nothing to do to cling to things so small! If you want to help the cause! get yourself out the computer !! shame on you !

  • Lena


    Shame on me? Help with what cause exactly? Its always funny when thirsty angry fan girls try to dress me down like that. The irony being when I’m not here or rescuing animals from the pound, I’m going to be in court on some dependency case, domestic violence, or child custody/child support issue. Do you even know what dependency or chins is dear? Your attempt at being self righteous when it comes to child molestation or child abuse falls flat when trying to put someone in her place who has been up to her knees in it professionally day after day for years.

    And, honestly, you’re exactly the easily manipulated zombie FOX is trying to capture by sending their 3 actor goon puppets out to make light of rape and sexual exploitation w/ their dance routine and pe/nis discussion. In my opinion, they wanted to condition the audience to “lighten up” about sexual antics and horseplay on movie sets, etc. And send a message to EGAN that his claim will be laughed at. They wanted to convey the idea, as Jackman said, you have to play sex games with these guys to help them get their “mojo,” on. Otherwise it won’t happen. Just as Jackman said, they had to do that to get Michael out of his trailer, etc. You think the PR directive given to those guys was just for YOU, the fan? Awww…how sweet..I feel FOX was sending a message to EGAN…

    They want people to react to EGAN just the way you have. And you are too stupid to realize how stupid you really are, dear. When EGAN starts talking about “grooming” and sexually hostile environments in Singers world in his case, they want people to say, “oh lighten up Egan, it’s show business… EVERYBODY plays sex games on movie sets. Those 3(X Men) guys did, and they aren’t crying rape…”
    Those 3 puppets had no reason to tie blurred lines into X-MEN whatsoever. Was the song in the soundtrack? Doubt it. Yet, blurred Lines is the subject of a 1. marketing print article for X-MEN and 2.the Graham Norton show. Twice.. FOX’s $5 rent boy message deliverers, plain and simple. Unless someone has litigated against an international company playing defense, they couldn’t possibly understand the complex level of play involved with the trial team, spin doctors, etc.

    You are naive if you think with a budget of $225 million and expected revenue of $1 billion, most likely notice in the form of presuit demand letters months ago, and a director accused of rape, FOX left PR up to these PR rent boys to “wing it.”. Did you forget where Hugh says, it was his understanding Graham had the “blurred lines” song in cue? So, print article coming from Fox (no doubt?) ABOUT blurred lines, weeks ago. Then, the prePLANNED, 3 puppets making light of sex play on movie sets through a little dance to “blurred lines” skit. WTF does “blurred lines” have to do with XMEN? Nothing. Rape? Something. Making a joke of it,?…And people laughing?… A direct message to EGAN of “f**k” you and you”ll be laughed out of town when we’re through? It fits…

    Anyone catch the Mark Ebner bullying circuit routine? @Nina, are you even smart enough to know who that is? LOL…in my opinion he’s out there warning Herman in so many words that if he goes down this path w/his cases, he will be ruined as a lawyer. Add in the 3 goonpuppet actors making light of sex play on set to show Egan that his claim will be laughed out of town, and to me its easy to see how studios try to use social media to silence and “shame” whistleblowers.

  • Sorry


    You are just a sad cranky old hag ! i feel sorry for humans like you who eat all the shit that is thrown at them . Bitching on many gossip sites ( yeah ..i recognize you ) sure makes you pathetic ….thank God i don’t live in total paranoia like you … bitch ..see a psychiatrist !!!!!! You are a sad old person !!!!

  • Bookworm

    For those in UK: Thurs 8th May, 9.30pm on BBC Two documentary fronted by Newsnight’s Kirsty Wark – ‘Blurred Lines: The New Battle of the Sexes’. Looks interesting and relevant to this discussion.
    BTW found the Graham Norton programme disappointing. Three immature men larking about like schoolboys. Do they ever get even slightly serious/intelligent/adult?
    I thought the prog with Matt Damon, Bill Murray, Hugh Bonneville and Paloma Faith far better and very funny.
    In recent Details pics and video with McAvoy, Fassy looked very handsome and quite serious and I actually thought he might have half a brain. After watching Norton I thought ‘hmmmmm maybe not!’.

  • Bookworm

    Meant to add in previous post – maybe that’s why, as far as we know he has never had a relationship with any of the attractive, intelligent women he has worked (in this I include actresses and other women involved with a production). Maybe he only does superficial.
    Still I suppose a man who looked and sounded like Fassbender with whom you could have in depth discussions about books, music, politics, economics, history etc etc could be almost too much for a woman to bear!
    Would love to do ‘In the Psychiatrist’s Chair’ with him

  • Then and Now

    Thanks for the tip on the documentary. Sounds interesting.
    You will probably find the interviews for Frank will have less high jinks.
    Films like X-Men try to generate a sort of up beat promotion and that kind of stuff is about getting people excited without spoiling the plot.
    It relies on the draw of the actors themselves moreso than the story I agree. They barely mention the film or anything about it in the interview. I assume this is because the story is fantasy and not neccesarily meaningful even if very enjoyable.

  • true love

    I’m sorry for you all but Michael and Madalina are still toghether and she will soon be pregnant.

  • Nina

    @Lena: How superior you are ?! Just a question why you keep on gossip sites responding “dumb” girls?
    If you do everything it claims to do, really really congratulations !
    But a hint of a girl with master degree (surprise !!!!) go get a life and a good psychological treatment!
    For what made ​​me answer you in an article about actors that I like their work (and super anxious to see the movie $ $ $ $ ops) was to see a crazy in the comments with a sad conspiracy theory! So I repeat: SHAME ON YOU AND I FEEL SORRY FOR YOU !


    @true love: I think they are still together, as well. Don’t know about the true love or pregnancy.

  • lol

    @IT’S HIS CHOICE: It can be. I do not really have a good opinion of Madalina since I have seen all the crazy games that she has made on social media and the fake hacker attack LOL but now it seems to have calmed down, maybe fassy asked her silence LOL but I do not understand, why hide it? Even the trip to Peru, there they may be seen in some remote location, almost like something illegal LOL Again, this whole thing is weird LOL

  • health problems

    A month ago, Madalina announces that she will retire from public life that have forced some health problems that still struggles since September last year.

  • lol

    @health problems: Ok, forget what I wrote LOL I read the article through google translate so do not know what is correct, but it says that it she is withdrawn for health problems when she continues to upload half naked pictures on the beach? LOL Ok, she’s completely crazy LOL and, I repeat, do not play with health issues. Thanks.

  • lol

    LOL I stop now, I promise. But why in the comments there is a link of an escort website? LOL

  • lol
  • Go Away

    @Lena: You’re not changing anyone’s mind. I plan to go see it and take 20 plus of my besties.

  • @Go Away
  • Interesting

    -Sigh- here we go again “Michael and Crazylina are still together” “Michael and Crazylina are in love” “Michael and Crazylina are having a baby” etc etc etc. Come on now really? Is there gonna be talk about her again after she hasn’t been mentioned in over a month? Oy. Somebody dared opened the door by mentioning her name and it was blown right opened for cr@p to start again. So,if a man wont claim u is he urs? Is that a “relationship”? Is his fassdong that good u wanna stay on it? D@mn, heck maybe I gotta try it to see what the fuss is all about. No I don’t believe they are still together, privately or otherwise. @lol I read the article and omg shes being fried real good aint she. Umm but even the article said Michael left her for Lupita -shrugs-. This is a female who loves playing media mind games with his fans and will not hesitate to post something, whether a pic or whatever, saying they spending time doing God knows what in God knows where. Would she use an illness to get attention and to get ppl to feel sorry for her and to get more fans and such like? I wouldn’t put it past her. If shes really sick where da he/ll does she find time to post anything. Just go away already sheesh. Dotn say ur gonna vanish, vanish and be done with smh. I absolutely refuse to give her any more attention, shes not, never will be important to me and worth mentioning
    Now as for the song Blurred Lines. Listening to it, the beat is catchy and the video (to the male eye) is appealing so perhaps that’s why Michael likes it. As for the lyrics I read it and some parts Im like eh not too bad, some parts my eyebrows popped up and I was like wow really. To me this is what I got from it: “A guy meets a girl, maybe at a club. She got a man not a husband (hence the line “no papers=not married”). They flirt they dance, she being sexy and all that. Now he wants her, wants to have s&x with her. She refuse. Shes a good girl. He tries to persuade her (as all guys do to get what they want, not regarding jst to s&x) Hes like yeah I know u want it, ur relationship with him is not serious, lets just go for it, u know I can do I just the way u like it, pull ur hair and such, lets hook up when ur in town, I can do it rough.” She still refuse. Yet shes dancing seductively, giving him the impression that shes gonna when shes not cuz shes a good girl. Hence the BLURRED LINES. Its a fine line between seducing and being seduced, giving in a little yet pulling back. I dotn know about anyone else but its not about rape, its not about scr&wing a h@@ker, its about seduction and u may or may not agree. Ive met guys who, when they want something, they go all out to convince. The girl may give in or she may not. If the girl says no hes gonna try harder. Sorry but that’s just how guys are. Now this is gonna sound very very controversial but its almost internal, a guys job is to convince a woman to do what she don’t want to do. Like I said its almost internal. They hardly ever accept no, thats why when they force a female what are they calle. As for us females, its also our job (internally) to be seductive and to do the same thing. I’ll admit for me Ive played the flirting game, does that mean a guy gonna get any? Heck no!! Hes just gonna have to accept it and move on. We all have out thing that makes us who we are. We’re made that way. U may or may not agree. So the song, to me, is about strictly male seduction, try and get a good girl to go bad, even for one night. U may or may not agree and thats ok

  • lol

    The video of Blurred Lines is crap. They have tried with some irony but is crap, the fruit of empty head. LOL
    The text is pure violence, no sensuality, woman just like object. Please, no excuses. LOL

  • Argent

    I haven’t been here for some time but I have to disagree. Michael is on his own and broke up with MG months ago. Does anyone remember when she and her model friend went to London? They stayed at a place not far from where he was filming. IMO, it was a bit of a chase on her part. She may have gone to chase after him but whatever she did it didn’t work. He ended it. Or he ended it before that and she didn’t get the message over the holidays.

    She never read the book, He’s Just Not Into You. Men aren’t that complicated. They don’t like to be chased. If they want you, they’ll come after you.

  • lol

    @@Go Away: Yes, that is what she is. Gross. And a men that has chosen someone like her, even for days, or weeks, and likes some kind of songs and so on is groos. Yes, the perfect definition. Gross. LOL
    And so, no family please, no interviews between kids, no indie film, no some sort of intellectual behaviour, no lies and so on. Gross. “I’m gross and i like to be”, the new Fassy’s motto. LOL

  • Bump

    @Health problems
    She is lying about retiring

    @true love

    You are clearly the Madalina troll who pops up at the mention of her name.

    If Madalina took him back it would confirm she is an Escort, as no real woman in love would allow for him to be happy to rumour that he is with Lupita and Naomi over and above her, (we know he was taking Naomi to all the classy joints he never took Madalina too)
    Why would she put up being treated like dirt unless she was being paid for her services and had no self respect.

  • Bump

    She was staying with him in Hackney for a while and probably at the same place while he was filming near surrey.
    But agree it appears to be a dead in the water thing now.

  • Argent

    @Bump: I don’t think she was in Hackney with him. She was in a rented bungalow far frim Hackney if that address where she outed her location was right.

  • truth

    Ohh girls, they are still toghether and she will announce soon new movies.

  • fruityscot

    @truth: Ya well she’s with someone now taking pics of her on the beach in France.

  • @Bump

    You have come to a conclusion. She is a victim and poses as a victim. And Fassbender is an idiot and does not need to pose as such, is evident. So Madalina is a victim and that idiot has decided to protect her. And this silence is to protect her. And they think that we are dumb just like them. And they have met years ago in Capri. Then they started their relationship in september 2013 and thing that nothing was wrong. Then thank of the scottish drama thing went worse. No, not because Madalina has a really bad reputation, not, but it was destiny. Fassbender is so idiot that started to think like her and all the stupid things about kabbala and so on. He talked also about vodoo for 12 years slave. You think that that was his opinion? No, just shit from the bad woman’s mouth. Brainwashed.

  • Watcher

    Who’s gonna protect Singer? Looks like he really does like underage boys. Sick. He needs some serious jail time. This article is written by a bigot who hates Jews but please disregard and read the rest and look at the pics. If this doesn’t scream ‘guilty’ I don’t know what does.

  • Lena

    RE: blurred lines…to me, the dispositive issue is not whether MICHAEL likes the song or he’s a guy that likes sexy or pretty girls. I like the “song.”. It was catchy for a minute. In a cheesy driving in traffic in the morning sort of limited way. The problem was the lyrics and the video. And the obvious controversy. And the decision to inject it into X Men I believe to disrupt, distract, and diffuse preemptive ly. And that pig Thicke knew what he was doing with the song last year. Being coy by “insisting” wink wink, it’s about his WIFE. Well, if true, why not put your wife in the video or make it a love story video rather than naked supermodels begging for anal from fully clothed guys, and simulation of sex with dead animals, etc? I don’t even object to S&M between CONSENTING adults. There’s a blind about Ron Howard and his wife and a dungeon… LOL. :). The issue is CONTROL and EXPLOITATION. Especially of minors. NOT consensual kinky adult sex. HUGE difference. What infuriated me was what I believe is FOX using “Blurred. Lines” as a PR marketing plan to send the message out to get the audience used to “laughing off” rape, and sexually charged film environments and movie sets to try to get people to get the idea in the back of their minds that the “casting couch” ain’t no no big deal. I wouldn’t be able to tell you any personal experience with trial teams of specific international billion dollar companies, but I would be very surprised if Fox didn’t know well in advance of the Egan suit filing, that it was coming, and I am convinced those guys were told by PR to go with that Blurred Lines thing. Graham knew about it beforehand. To me, it was planned. Jackman cued it up. And I think there was a message there. Maybe all three didn’t know, but one did I believe. Hugh is discussed on data lounge often as having ties to Singer. I’m not accusing. I don’t know. I’m just keeping my eyes open as well as my ears.

    Off Topic tor a second: did anyone see DiCaprio is moving in with Teri Garm? Coincidentally, right after Clooney gets engaged, Jodie Foster suddenly gets married, that other actor reveals he has been secretly married to a guy, and blinds are saying we should expect more of this stuff as Sh/t hits the fan with the Egan spurred on scandal brewing below the surface? I believe everyone is batting down the hatches preparing for a hurricane. Just my opinion. These folks who have been known for vices, I believe are setting up PR immunizations in various forms.We’ll see. Possibly because they are not sure whether they will get sucked into the EGAN house cleaning “vortex.”

    I finally READ Egan’s complaint in federal court. It’s brilliantly written as far as I’m concerned. Very tight, brief. I will summarize by separate post. It’s very plausible to me.

    By the way, Michael seemed to dance only a little to the Blurred Lines song, and looked like he quickly said ENOUGH. I suspect there is a reason for that. It looked like forced fun. And to me, he didnt look comfortable doing it. And he was right to feel that way if true. To me, it was a manipulated message of some sort that had no real connection to X Men or the target audience. Just my opinion.

  • Watcher

    Re “gay rights”. IMO, if you are gay and a pedophile, and you’ve been caught, under US law, you’re goin’ down and not in a good way. You deserve a long long jail sentence.. Maybe some old lifers in prison can straighten you out.

    Gay rights means gays pay for their crimes like everyone else.

  • Lena

    After you read this, perhaps you will see why them going with “Blurred Lines” is grossly inappropriate, and to me was possibly a message PR wise to make light of rape or through Singer as an X Men message to EGAN? The Egan complaint is on the internet. Just Google it. I won’t attach it here because it might spam filter my post. But it was very interesting. For those interested in the case, I would also Google Chad Shackley, and Collins-Rector and a company called DEN. 1998. Those two were indicted and prosecuted for an underage sex ring which they operated through DEN way back then. I had not realized how close EGAN was to all of this. Or Singer (as alleged…it’s all just allegations what I’m summarizing but I do note EGAN got a default judgment against Collins Rector, so whether that will help him to establish facts, that depends… way too complicated to get into how that works…so I’ll just table that)

    But (summary as alleged in Egan’s complaint). EGAN was a print model beginning in grade school in the Midwest then started acting as a kid. He moved with his family to California and went to a very small private school. I think it said 4 kids in his grade. His close friend was Scott Shackley who introduced him to his older brother Chad Shackley who lived in a mansion in Encino. Chad and Collins Rector ran DEN. Singer was an “investor.” So, this is where Jim Clemente, FBI profiler was saying the case is about “grooming.”. They put Egan on the payroll for a DEN show at $1500 a week, and he was promised gifts, stock in DEN, auditions for roles, etc. Then the complaint talks about the huge parties. Lots of drugs, alcohol, sex performances, paid sex, etc The complaint basically describes powerful adult males in the entertainment industry coming over to have sex with teenage boys.. (NOTE: honestly, it sounds like what the folks at data lounge are always dedcribing as a Singer pool party. That’s not good. It seems Singer got the idea from Collins Rector eh? But just decided to check id’s? Maybe Herman will drag Mark Ebner in to talk about him warning Singer. Ebner was boasting about it on Media Mayhem…LOL…:)…)

    Then they told him he was gay even though he said he wasn’t. He was told they controlled Hollywood, etc. They shoved cocaine in him while holding him down. They told him they would decide whether he would make it in Hollywood or not, spike his drinks, threatened his family. It was Collins Rector who held a gun to his head and locked him in a gun safe. I think this combination of events is the conditioning that Clemente was referring to as “grooming.”. Singer appeared later after Collins abused Egan for a time. I can see why this 15 year old kid stayed and kept returning. First of all, his family moved to CA for him to make it big. He was getting paid $5000 a month for his family (to act, not to have sex), then once in, they threatened him, confused him about his sexuality, it was his BEST FRIENDS brother who got him in, and once you’re in that situation as 15 year old, I can imagine feelings of fear from all directions as well as confusion sets in. And he was forced on to drugs.

    Then he goes into detail about Singer. He says he encountered him in the pool and was forced to engage in sex acts with him, forced under water I believe. And afterwards was abused in an ongoing fashion by Singer. The trip to Hawaii was supposedly with CR, shackley, and others, and Singer was there and he was forced to stay with him in a room for 2 nights. And there was more than one trip. And when he went for a walk alone, when he came back, Singer was waiting, got mad and told him he was there to make people happy. Singer allegedly spiked drinks, forced cocaine in him, anally raped him at least 3 times I believe in Hawaii (not sure if that was that one stay) and Egan says at all times he resisted. 4 count complaint: Assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress and invasion of privacy.

  • Lena


    The EGAN case has NOTHING to do with the gay community. It’s about sexual exploitation of minors and Human CONTROL. Sex abuse is not about sex but rather abuse. Gay is about loving emotionally and physically members of the same sex. Nothing to do with one another.

    @Interesting… way to go with the long post… That’s the spirit… I liked the discussion and debate and analysis, whether I agree or not.

  • Watcher

    @Lena: Oh it has EVERYTHING to do with the gay community, if it’s been covered up by some all these years. It isn’t a gay issue, I agree. But Egan isn’t claiming that straight women assaulted him, is he? He’s naming gay men.

    You missed my point entirely. My point is that no matter what your sexual preference, pedophilia is WRONG. Singer should have his day(s) in court and if found guilty, he needs serious jail time. Wouldn’t you agree?

    Now it looks like another man is claiming assault by Singer, a British guy who was a teen at the time. When you look at all the pics of Singer and obviously underage boys, it makes you wonder. It’s sickening that no one reported this sooner because other adults at the time had to have known this was sick and illegal.

  • Observation

    This is a big mess. I see that everyone in Hollywood has gone silent on the subject. Possibly because the goings on were well known and no one wanted to say anything for fear of not getting work. What a terrible thing to do to a young boy or girl. It ruins lives. Those party photos are pretty bad and I’m sure those young boys are’s BS’s cousins. I’m sure it goes on with young girls and old men too.

  • Observation

    ***aren’t BS’s cousins.

  • Questra

    Kinda scary about the film and these stories. Hope it does ok. I’m hoping to see it regardless.