Jennifer Garner: It's Against the Law Not to Wear Sunscreen!
Jennifer Garner chats on the phone while heading for lunch at R+D Kitchen on Thursday (March 14) in Santa Monica, Calif.
Earlier in the day, the 40-year-old actress was spotted walking hand in hand with her adorable daughter Seraphina while exiting Brentwood Country Mart.
PHOTOS: Check out the latest pics of Jennifer Garner
On the same day, Jennifer‘s husband Ben Affleck carried portfolios while stepping out of a friend’s house in Burbank.
The day before, Jennifer was was a purple beauty while attending the Neutrogena Sun Summit.
“I think I once told my kids it was against the law not to wear sunscreen,” Jennifer shared at the summit.
20+ pictures inside of Jennifer Garner heading to lunch at R+D Kitchen…








Older





















15 Comments
Ben’s face is priceless
Also… I wonder if they even have a full time nanny? She is one of the very few celebs I ALWAYS see with her kids!
They have a full time/on call nanny, sure. I would too if I had three kids, a career which required a lot of traveling, and the money. I think the difference is that some celebs let the nannies raise the kids, while others, like Jen, raise their own kids with the nanny there to assist when needed.
@Courtney: what? she has 3 and they’ve been in most of the pics on here with her
@rachel: how would you know if she raises them full time? LOL i usually see pics of the kids with the nannies all the time, there have been a few posts where it’s just been the kids with their nannies instead of jennifer garner.
Seraphina looks so much like Ben!
@ha~: oh wow ok I guess I never look at all the remainding thumbnails so I never saw the nannies… makes sense though since they’re busy with their careers. It just seems like she’s always with the kids, dropping them off places, going to playdates.. etc…
@ha~: I’m basing my assumption mainly on the amount of pics I’ve seen of Jennifer with her kids. One minute you have the haters saying Jen is out everyday with her kids looking for paps. The next minute they accuse her of pawning her kids off to an army of nannies. She’s either with them or she’s not. It can’t be both ways.
It should be against the law to have an ugly face like hers ewww!
@Sunscreen:
LOL!!!And dress like that and be so fake.
@rachel: on pictures? that means nothing – a few seconds of pap photos does not amount to a good (or bad) mother. this woman has a horrible reputation for being cruel to other women she works with so i’m not completely sure how good a person she is (and that’s being polite)
Ha~ define cruel to other women she works with. It has been said so before, but no one really defines or gives an example of her being a *****. If she was responding to other ******* remarks on set or told off somebody hitting on her husband, oh well…what should she do but be the best of them ******* she can?
There is always somebody finding excuses for this ****** woman.
What IS that child wearing?
@ha~: No, you don’t understand. I can’t say she’s a good mother based on pictures, but I can see that she’s a present mother. She’s there, she’s with them. i.e. The biggest reason you don’t see other celeb moms taking their kids to school is because they never don’t – the nanny or driver always does. And I really don’t know where you’re getting the idea she’s hated in the industry. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Loll….!!!! just modefy ,,,,,,,,