Top Stories

Shailene Woodley's Mary Jane Cut Out of 'Amazing Spider-Man 2'

Shailene Woodley's Mary Jane Cut Out of 'Amazing Spider-Man 2'

Shailene Woodley‘s role as Mary Jane Watson in the highly anticipated sequel The Amazing Spider-Man 2 has been dropped to the cutting room floor, according to Entertainment Weekly.

The 21-year-old actress spent a week filming scenes in New York City for the upcoming superhero flick, but now her role won’t be introduced until the series’ third film.

“Of course I’m bummed. But I am a firm believer in everything happening for a specific reason… Based on the proposed plot, I completely understand the need for holding off on introducing [Mary Jane] until the next film,” Shailene told the mag.

“I made a creative decision to streamline the story and focus on Peter and Gwen and their relationship,” director Marc Webb added (via THR). “Shailene is an incredibly talented actress and while we only shot a few scenes with Mary Jane, we all love working with her.”

It is being speculated that the role of Mary Jane will be recast for the third film.

ARE YOU BUMMED that Shailene Woodley won’t be in The Amazing Spider-Man 2?

Like Just Jared on Facebook

JJ Links Around The Web

ABC

18 Responses to “Shailene Woodley's Mary Jane Cut Out of 'Amazing Spider-Man 2'”

  1. 1
    SAlly Says:

    GREAT NOW that Snake looking girl(Emma Stone) can be happy !

  2. 2
    Duh. Says:

    Not really. They need to keep the story between Peter and Gwen alive as those who read the comics know what’s going to happen to her.

  3. 3
    Gucci Says:

    No. More Gwen a Peter for a while :)

  4. 4
    Tragic Says:

    I hope they recast

  5. 5
    Madison Says:

    I hope that Shailene will come back to play MJ in the next movie.

  6. 6
    omg Says:

    I hope they will recast , I cant stand shailene

  7. 7
    jaelyn Says:

    def disappointed. Shailene is the sh*t and she knows it.
    haters gonna hate.

  8. 8
    saira Says:

    Good. They need to recast that role anyway. Mary Jane was a smokin’ hot, bodacious, redheaded model-actress. Surely, there is a capable actress that can fit that role. No disrespect to Kirsten and Shailene, but come on.
    I vote Shay Mitchell. Dye her hair red, and she could totally make Peter get over Gwen–after she dies.

  9. 9
    Daniel Says:

    @saira: Or Amanda Seyfried ? she’d be awsome but i don’t think they’ll recast LOL

  10. 10
    Maris Says:

    I know it’s horrible to say this but I’m really happy she’s not gonna be in it, and I agree, they should recast MJ or I might just drop it altogether once Emma is out

  11. 11
    Melissa Says:

    They need to recast MJ or I don’t think I’ll want to see any of the movies past the 2nd.

  12. 12
    honeychile Says:

    The should cast Amanda Bynes as Mary Jane because all the other girls on earth are UGLY!

  13. 13
    Sophia Says:

    I think they realized that the movie wasn’t going anywhere with Shailene’s character and that there’s no more time to re-film with someone else, so the only option is cut her part. Plus, that also that gives them more material for the next movies. And it so obvious that they’re re-casting. When a director is happy with his actors there’s no reason to cut their part, the natural thing would be fighting for the characters.

  14. 14
    Nikki Says:

    Hey, at least she’s in the next film! If having Mary-Jane enter into the second film didn’t make sense, then they needed to cut it.

  15. 15
    Hamlet Says:

    Actors have had their scenes cut all the time, #13. This is nothing new.

  16. 16
    Duh. Says:

    @saira: Shay Mitchell? Seriously? SHE DOESN’T”T HAVE THE LOOK FOR MARY JANE. Also, she’s not being recasted. Her scenes will be in the third installment not the second.

  17. 17
    nm Says:

    way to go on playing the Garfield-Stone relationship card.

  18. 18
    dl Says:

    pvfif iffjkfor

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here