Top Stories

Megan Fox Replacing Lindsay Lohan in Elizabeth Taylor Movie?

Megan Fox Replacing Lindsay Lohan in Elizabeth Taylor Movie?

Megan Fox tries to hide her face from photographers at LAX Airport on Tuesday (January 17) in Los Angeles.

The 25-year-old actress is reportedly in talks to play the late Elizabeth Taylor in an upcoming Lifetime movie – a role that Lindsay Lohan is also eying.

“I’ve been talking to Lindsay Lohan directly, and with her reps, and have been in conversations with other actresses, including Megan Fox,” Larry Thompson, the executive producer of Lifetime’s Liz and Dick, told E! News.

FYI: Megan is carrying a Theodora & Callum Teal Multi Navajo Blanket Scarf.

10+ pictures inside of Megan Fox at LAX Airport…

Like Just Jared on Facebook
megan fox hides face lax 01
megan fox hides face lax 02
megan fox hides face lax 03
megan fox hides face lax 04
megan fox hides face lax 05
megan fox hides face lax 06
megan fox hides face lax 07
megan fox hides face lax 08
megan fox hides face lax 09
megan fox hides face lax 10
megan fox hides face lax 11
megan fox hides face lax 12
megan fox hides face lax 13

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Ryan Adams performed a ballad after his split from Mandy Moore- US Weekly
  • Richard Simmons got a visit from cops, who say he is fine- TMZ
  • Watch Blake Shelton perform “Boys ’Round Here” on SNL- Gossip Cop
  • See cute videos of R5 at Sundance Film Festival- Just Jared Jr
  • Gia Giudice made a tribute video for her mom Teresa- Radar
  • What should you know about Sundance Film Festival?- Huffington Post
  • Read a review of The Boy Next Door- Lainey Gossip
  • Who just got cast in Quentin Tarantino's Hateful Eight?- The Hollywood Reporter

38 Responses to “Megan Fox Replacing Lindsay Lohan in Elizabeth Taylor Movie?”

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

  1. 1
    Asha Says:

    It is a freaking LIFETIME movie. I don’t know what either of them has to be excited about.

  2. 2
    tt Says:

    Megan is a talented actress and gorgeous. She would be PERFECT to play Liz!

  3. 3
    vi_1004 Says:

    Megan is gorgeous, but let’s be honest: she can’t act…. and I just don’t want to see her ruining this movie. It’s a serious part – to play Elizabeth Taylor. She shouldn’t be in the movie at all, neither should Lindsay.

  4. 4
    superfly Says:

    Take Lindsay!!

  5. 5
    abc Says:

    Kate Winslet expressed interest. Why are they still looking? Make this a real movie.

  6. 6
    reed Says:

    Is Megan so desperate for acting work that she would do a Lifetime movie? .

  7. 7
    vool Says:

    both are crap actresses

  8. 8
    chris Says:

    this is bull spun by the producer to drum up interest for his Lifetime movie….megan fox would never do it and lindsay is a joke

  9. 9
    Creed Says:

    What a slap to her face. “The only person to play Elizabeth Taylor is Elizabeth Taylor”

    Screw Lifetime!! Really! Angelina Jolie should play Liz IF it would be a STUDIO movie! But no on in hollywood will make it because they RESPECT Elizabeth.

  10. 10
    Creed Says:

    Besides, it is insulting THAT ONE OF HOLLYWOODS FINEST ACTRESSES TO DATE has the possibility of being played by 2 of the least respected and worst actresses to date.

  11. 11
    me Says:

    Megan has very cat-like, small eyes and Elizabeth had very big, round eyes. That alone makes this a very poor choice. Megan can’t act either. It’s a lifetime movie though, I’m sure it will be very campy and ridiculous anyway

  12. 12
    shyla Says:

    god she looks comfortable.
    eff it. im just gonna dress like that every day of my life.

  13. 13
    wilhemina Says:

    who do u think would be good?
    kate beckinsale?
    jennifer connelly?
    but im just thinking of them because theyre brunettes.
    connelly would actually be way tall for liz.
    beckinsale is much shorter.
    or maybe an unknown.

  14. 14
    naylah Says:


  15. 15
    snakeeyes Says:

    ARE YOU kidding me?! That woman is the woman my dreams and this HACK of an actress thinks sh’es going to be playing the great lady?? Just no.

    Liz Taylor had CURVES meaning she was NOT SKINNY there was MEAT on her; and her skin wasn’t sickly nor was her hair artificially colored black and her lips weren’t injected and teeth corrected, nor was her nose done – or was she a plastic surgery fanatic.

    Meaning she was a NATURAL stunning beauty.

    Irony too is that she was JEWISH and would NEVER have wanted an actress who compared a Jewish director to Adolf Hitler playing her.

    Not Lohan and DEFINITELY not Megan Fox.

    Oh and she could ACT.

  16. 16
    LadyB Says:

    Asha, took the words out of my mouth. I love Lifetime Movies. They are my guilty pleasure but since when did you hear top actors gearing for lifetime roles. I mean, if it was HBO, it will be a different story but Lifetime is where you find actors that were popular in the 80s and early 90s. If I were Fox, I won’t take the role. She can do better. And Lifetime don’t spend a lot of money for their movies, so I’m not how they can make an Elizabeth Taylor movie with a lot of conviction.

  17. 17
    Kari Says:

    I wouldn’t say her eyes were large or round

  18. 18
    snakeeyes Says:


  19. 19
    Michael Bay Says:

    It seems as if she wears nothing but sweatpants and Uggs. Class.

  20. 20
    -.- Says:

    @vi_1004: hahah maybe she’ll do good but im not watching it either way.

  21. 21
    Lola Says:

    I think they’re mainly using her name to garner publicity, but Megan over Lindsay any day for anything.

  22. 22
    LaCroix Says:

    Srsly? yes because to play a legend you have to be a no talent actresses? Liz Taylor deserves more even if it is a LIFETIME movie.

  23. 23
    juli Says:
    best megan fox look alike

  24. 24
    sneg Says:

    Elizabeth Taylor was an adulteress and a **** from beginning to end!! So a Lifetime movie would be appropriate. Really who would pay to see a movie about her in the theaters? As for Kate Winslet or Angelina Jolie playing her, they would fit the bill personality wise but don’t you guys think they are a little old? Because if they are considering two 20-something year-old actresses suggesting two almost 40 year-old actresses seem a bit ridiculous!!

  25. 25
    Sharon Says:

    Still stuck on your headline. No one is replacing Lindsay Lohan. She was never signed to play the role. Even a Lifetime movie must have some standards. Lohan has done nothing but mugshots for several years now. There are far to many working, talented actresses to consider her, let alone replace her.

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

A Member of Townsquare Entertainment News | Advertise here