Top Stories

Pregnant Alyssa Milano Looks Glowing with a Large Baby Bump

Pregnant Alyssa Milano Looks Glowing with a Large Baby Bump

Alyssa Milano shows off her growing baby bump while stepping out for an appearance on Good Morning America on Monday (June 2) in New York City’s Times Square.

The 41-year-old pregnant actress was joined by her Mistresses co-stars Yunjim Kim, Rochelle Aytes, and Jes Macallan to promote the second season of their summer series, which kicks of TONIGHT at 10/9c on ABC!

PHOTOS: Check out the latest pics of Alyssa Milano

FYI: Alyssa is wearing a Lanvin dress, Dolce&Gabbana shoes, and Erickson Beamon jewelry.

15+ pictures inside of Alyssa Milano showing off her baby bump…

Just Jared on Facebook
alyssa milano pregnant large baby bump 01
alyssa milano pregnant large baby bump 02
alyssa milano pregnant large baby bump 03
alyssa milano pregnant large baby bump 04
alyssa milano pregnant large baby bump 05
alyssa milano pregnant large baby bump 06
alyssa milano pregnant large baby bump 07
alyssa milano pregnant large baby bump 08
alyssa milano pregnant large baby bump 09
alyssa milano pregnant large baby bump 10
alyssa milano pregnant large baby bump 11
alyssa milano pregnant large baby bump 12
alyssa milano pregnant large baby bump 13
alyssa milano pregnant large baby bump 14
alyssa milano pregnant large baby bump 15
alyssa milano pregnant large baby bump 16
alyssa milano pregnant large baby bump 17

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Katt Williams reportedly isn't cooperating with police in his gun investigation - TMZ
  • Dylan Sprouse had tons of support at the premiere of his new movie - Just Jared Jr
  • Josh Groban reacts to being the subject of one of Katy Perry's hit songs - TooFab
  • The reviews are in for Joaquin Phoenix's new movie - Lainey Gossip
  • This YouTuber just bravely came out as bisexual - Just Jared Jr
  • Justin Bieber is perfectly healthy - Gossip Cop
  • Brittany

    Still gorgeous after all these years.

  • selfish

    Why do these selfish celebs take risks of reproducing at such an old age? According to geneticists, a woman over 35 and a man over 40 years old have a very high risk of producing a child with numerous abnormalities. How selfish can one be?

  • janet

    @selfish: that stat is only true of women over 35 who have never had a baby before. a woman who has had children before, even if she’s like halle berry (47) is less at risk than a 1st time mom over 40

  • courtney

    @Janet you are right on that and age doesn’t guarantee problems with the baby either abnormalities/disabilities can happen to a baby from a mother of any age Barbra Bach was 25 when her son Gianni was born with cerebral palsy in 1972 and her was her second child she already had a daughter Francesca

  • Kim

    Selfish….your comment is one of the most ignorant I’ve ever read…I’m 39 and expecting my first child…wanting to be a mother isn’t selfish…in fact it’s very selfless. Not everyone meets the right person in their 20s…should they forego having a child because the chance comes later in life? There are always risks…I have many friends who had children in their 20s and have had children with Down syndrome, autism, cp and spina bifida..there are no guarantees of a healthy child even when you are younger. I hope if you do have children you teach them to be kind and respectful instead of being rude and making ignorant comments like the one above!!

  • Allen Greenspan

    These Women having Children so late in life are playing with fire.

  • James

    @Kim: You are selfish no matter what you say. You are biologically old and there’s nothing you can do about it. Do you think nature cares when you meet the right father for your kids or when you finally decide that your career can wait now? You are all so stupid. Thousands of years women have kids from the age of fifteen (you can guess twice why we start to have our period so young) and have a menopause from the ge of 40. But last decade bunch of ambicious cows come and say this is an avolution, we can have babies at the age of grandmas. Listen to yourself. You put your own needs before the nature. That’s not selfish? Think about this. Our only purpose on this planet is to reproduce ourself to keep human race alive. You are not special. You are just one female who should have kids. If you miss your time your life was absolutely useless. That’s raw natural law. I don’t care about this psychological and social crap about self realization. It’s all useless. If there’s a catastrophy we would take couple women and men to reproduce and that would be basically all we would do. We would take selfies, computers, cellphones, iPads, gold, diamonds…we would take the one think that matters the most-our fertility. Guess why do we have instincts such as sexual one. Because that matters the most! And yes, I’m a scientist. And this racional thinking is very useful. You cannot change nature. You only think you can cheat it.

  • Kim

    James….you’re a scientist?!!! That’s a might want to learn proper grammar and how to spell!! I think it’s safe to say if there was a catastrophe your sperm would be ruled out during survival of the fittest!!!! There is no need to get nasty and call others stupid and cows and assume just because a woman has a kid later that she put her career first…and some people can’t have children even at a younger age…I’d hardly say their life was useless…you have no idea what they’ve accomplished in their life…Isaac newtown never had children…was his life a waste? You’re an idiot.
    Only think I can cheat fate? Well it appears I have….lol…you want to call someone stupid? Try looking in a mirror!!

  • Laura

    WTH is wrong with you people?!!! You see pictures of a happy pregnant woman and all you can say is “omg she’s too old to have a baby!How selfish!”

    I had my son at 25 sure it’s a perfect age but in no way did it mean there were no risks for abnormalities for him, he was born without any thank god, but my Mom had 3 miscarriages at my age in between she had my older sister, after the last miscarriage they told her there was hardly any chance of her having a baby again… Then she found out 5 years later she was pregnant with me which was an unexpected surprise and that pregnany was the easiest one she had ever had… She was 38.

  • Blake

    I’m so sorry that you have to see these negative, ridiculous statements. I think you handled your responses beautifully. Best of luck with the rest of your pregnancy and congratulations!!!!

  • James

    @Kim: Are you educated in biology or antropology or medicine or another nature science? You are not. So you can’t argue with me. You make your decisions based on your desires not your instincts or knowledge. I am not a native speaker so that’s pretty silly to laugh at me because of my English. Still you haven’t prooved me you’re not biologically old for having first child at 39. And I really don’t think that Newton is essential for the existence of human race or this planet.

  • tasha

    Having your own children is selfish at any age.. Wanting to sow your seen into the world and “prolong” your life. Disgusting. The only noble act is adoption. Safe a life, don’t create more!

  • michlou

    @Kim: Well said Kim.
    A scientist with bad grammer….well well (shaking my head on this one).
    James, everyone has the right to live their life the way they choose without
    judgement. Your negativity is one of the reasons we have so much hate in this world and so many problems.
    So many gutless people write nasty things on the web because they can. If they were face to face it would probably be a different story.